Whether a financial provider like Stake is reliable and legit is an important and very legitimate question one can have. After all you trust Stake with your investment money and savings. It is also a very common question, we get this asked a number of times.
One thing worth bearing in mind: all the brokers that you find on BrokerChooser are regulated by at least one top-tier authority. So in this basic sense Stake is of course legit. Additionally, there are other factors you can take into account when you check the reliability of Stake, e.g. if Stake is listed on any exchange, provide two-step login, disclose transparently its financial result, etc.
Here, we've collected and summarized the common questions on broker reliability, enabling you to decide for yourself whether you consider Stake reliable in your individual circumstances. We also compared Stake with two similar brokers.
|Broker listed on stock exchange||No||No||No|
|Annual financial statements on website||No||No||No|
|Mobile two-step authentication||Yes||Yes||Yes|
|Broker ownership transparency||No||No||Yes|
|Broker management transparency||No||No||Yes|
|Broker is audited by the Big Four||No||Yes||No|
Things always worth considering
When you assess a stock broker it's best to think through the following aspects:
- What authority or authorities regulate the broker? In other words who can you turn to if something goes south?
- How much protection do you have?
- For how long Stake has been in operation?
- Is it publicly traded itself?
- How transparent is it?
- How much do they protect your account from unauthorized access?
- What auditor audits the brokerage?
As you see there are a number of aspects above. But not all of them were created equal.
We think the most important feature is to be regulated by at least one trustworthy authority.
First and foremost, to gather a wider knowledge about one broker's reliability, you should check the regulators of it. For this purpose, we sum up below the most important things to know about regulators and how to interpret them for your individual case.
Stake is regulated in the following countries and provides the following investor protection:
|Country of regulation:||Australia, UK|
|Investor protection amount:||$500,000 (securities up to $500,000, cash up to $250,000)|
The investor protection amount and the regulator might differ based on which entity you belong to.
For the avoidance of doubt, it is
- By and large your home country (i.e. your residence, not your passport) that will determine under which regulator you'll fall, should there be more than one regulator.
- In some cases you might choose between regulators, and that being said, we recommend you choosing the higher-tier regulator, e.g. FCA over CySEC.
Don't forget that regulators are not created equal. Investor protection can also vary from authority to authority. There are top-tier regulators whose excellence lies within their features such as the presence of segregated accounts, the range of protection tools or the investor protection amount itself. Check out a few of the top-tiers in the table below. Most brokers reviewed by BC fall below one of the following four regulators:
|FCA in the UK||Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) provides coverage up to £85,000.|
|SEC, FINRA in the US||Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) covers up to $500,000, including a $250,000 limit for cash.|
|BaFIN in Germany||€100,000 for cash, and €20,000 for securities.|
|ASIC in Australia||No investor protection.|
Stake is regulated by the top-tier UK regulator, the FCA or Financial Conduct Authority. FCA monitors which firms and individuals are able to enter the financial markets and supervises how firms work and stop those that don't meet their standards.
If a broker goes bankrupt, eligible customers would also be protected by the FSCS up to £85,000 per claimant per firm. For forex and CFD brokers you're also covered by negative account balance protection. A non-UK citizen is treated the same way as a UK resident in case something goes south.
There are some brokers that provide additional insurance because they have private insurance (e.g.: eToro through Lloyd's, among the US brokers Charles Schwab and Ally have similar setups), which means that you have an extra reliability net above the regulatory. It's worth checking it out when you're choosing your broker.
Additional "nice to have" safety features
The subsequent bullet points are rather supplementary, “nice to have” features. Ticking them definitely adds to the reliability and legitimacy of an online broker, but not having them is not necessarily a big red flag.
Stake doesn't have a banking background, which is not crucial, but would make a better case for their reliability. The reason is that even if it's not required by law that a struggling broker must be saved by its parent bank, in most cases you can count on this happening.
Broker listed on stock exchange
Stake is not listed on any stock exchange, hence it's harder to get detailed or any kind of direct information about its financial performance.
Why is being listed on the stock market useful? For two reasons:
- Listed companies by and large have stringent reporting requirements
- If something really goes wrong with the broker, you'll be able to tell it from the (rapidly falling) share price of the broker in most cases. In this unlikely scenario, you'll have time to move your funds and securities to another broker.
Annual financial statements on website
Stake doesn't publish annual financial statements. These are sort of financial reports, which generally contain information about a brokerage's income, profit and loss, retained earnings and cash flows. Not having these exposed to the public doesn't necessarily mean that a broker is not reliable or legit, it's just a factor that we should take into account when choosing where to invest or trade.
Mobile two-step authentication
Stake provides two-step authentication when logging in, which makes the platform safer to use.
Broker ownership transparency
Ownership structure of Stake is not public, it can't be checked on their website, which leaves some questions open about one's feeling of being up-to-date about the broker.
Broker management transparency
Stake has not made their management structure public, which can leave you with a sense of lack considering the broker's transparency and reliability.
Broker is audited by the Big Four
Stake is not audited by one of the so-called Big Four auditors (KPMG, PWC, Deloitte, EY), which is not necessarily an issue, however it would guarantee another layer of reliability.
Want to stay in the loop?
Sign up to get notifications about new BrokerChooser articles right into your mailbox.
Now that we have gone through the most frequent and - as we think - most important reliability aspects of Stake, we hope that you feel armed enough with information for your future decision. In case you're still unsure, use our broker finder and meet the best online broker that suits your needs.